Yesterday all the world was up in arms over the sudden shift in our zodiac signs. People with their sign tattooed on them suddenly felt
like Gucci Mane ridiculous, people were “lost”…it was a mess! LOL! I know I was quite upset as I’ve identified myself as a Leo my whole life and then suddenly you’re telling me I’m a Cancer. WHAT?! But never fear my darling lovers of the zodiac….apparently it did not change for us after all. Read the details after the jump.
(CNN) – Before astrology fans scrape the ink from their arms because they think they’re now a Virgo instead of a Libra, they should consider this: If they adhered to the tropical zodiac – which, if they’re a Westerner, they probably did â€“ absolutely nothing has changed for them.
That’s worth rephrasing: If you considered yourself a Cancer under the tropical zodiac last week, you’re still a Cancer under the same zodiac this week.
That’s because the tropical zodiac â€“ which is fixed to seasons, and which Western astrology adheres to â€“ differs from the sidereal zodiac â€“ which is fixed to constellations and is followed more in the East, and is the type of zodiac to which the Star Tribune article ultimately refers.
Two zodiacs. That’s nothing new.
“This story is born periodically as if someone has discovered some truth. It’s not news,” said Jeff Jawer, astrologer with Tarot.com.
The hubbub started with Sunday’s Star Tribune article, which said the following: “The ancient Babylonians based zodiac signs on the constellation the sun was ‘in’ on the day a person was born. During the ensuing millenniums, the moonâ€™s gravitational pull has made the Earth ‘wobble’ around its axis, creating about a one-month bump in the stars’ alignment.”
“When [astrologers] say that the sun is in Pisces, itâ€™s really not in Pisces,” Parke Kunkle, a board member of the Minnesota Planetarium Society, told the Star Tribune.
“Indeed,” the article continued, “most horoscope readers who consider themselves Pisces are actually Aquarians.” The article also asserts Scorpio’s window lasts only seven days, and that a 13th constellation, Ophiuchus, used to be counted between Scorpio and Sagittarius but was discarded by the Babylonians because they wanted 12 signs per year.
True enough, Jawer says, the sun doesn’t align with constellations at the same time of year that it did millennia ago. But thatâ€™s irrelevant for the tropical zodiac, codified for Western astrology by Ptolemy in the second century, he says.
In the tropical zodiac, the start of Aries is fixed to one equinox, and Libra the other.
“When we look at the astrology used in the Western world, the seasonally based astrology has not changed, was never oriented to the constellations, and stands as â€¦ has been stated for two millenniums,” Jawer said.
People who put stock in astrology can ask whether they should adhere to the tropical zodiac or the sidereal zodiac. Jawer argues for the tropical.
“Astrology is geocentric. It relates life on Earth to the Earthâ€™s environment, and seasons are the most dramatic effect, which is why we use the tropical zodiac,” he said.