Posted by Sabrina B. @gametimegirl

Four former NFL players, including Hall of Fame defensive end Carl Eller, sued the NFL on Monday in hopes of joining current players in their antitrust fight against the league.

Eller, three-time All-Pro running back Priest Holmes and ex-players Obafemi Ayanbadejo and Ryan Collins are listed as plaintiffs in the 44-page complaint filed in federal court in Minneapolis and obtained by The Associated Press. It seeks class-action status on behalf of all former players.

The retirees want the NFL lockout lifted to ensure their pensions and health benefits remain funded. According to the lawsuit, those benefits will end if a collective bargaining agreement is not renewed by next March 11 — a year after the last one expired.

The NFL offers retirement, disability and death benefits, with each program subsidized by the 32 teams. The benefits can be terminated if no CBA is in effect for more than a year, the lawsuit says.

The case was assigned to Senior U.S. District Judge Richard Kyle in St. Paul, Minn., where U.S. District Judge Susan Richard Nelson is scheduled to hold an April 6 hearing on a request by current players to immediately halt the lockout.

Shawn Stuckey, an attorney for the retired players, said he intends to ask the court to combine the retirees’ lawsuit with the antitrust suit filed by Tom Brady, Drew Brees, Peyton Manning and others.

“We hope that we can be a part of that hearing. For the sake of judicial economy, it would help to streamline things to make sure you get all parties involved at the same table at the same hearing at the same time,” Stuckey said.

He added: “If we can’t get that, we want to give the retired players a voice.”

NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said in an email that league attorneys had not yet had an opportunity to review the retirees’ lawsuit and declined to comment.

On Monday, current NFL players defended their right to disband as a union and file the antitrust suit, saying employers cannot force workers to unionize, and dissolution is “not akin to turning off a light switch.”

The players made the statements in a court document filed in response to the NFL’s assertion decertification was “a sham.”

The players say that prior court decisions have made it clear the right of workers not to unionize is absolute. The players disclaimed their union, gave up the right to strike, to collectively bargain and to have union representation.

“The players sacrificed these labor law rights for one reason: to gain the ability to assert antitrust claims against anticompetitive restrictions imposed by defendants,” lawyers for the players argued on Monday.

Regarding the players’ reponse to the league Aiello said, “There are no surprises or arguments we did not expect. The union’s lawyers still fail to come to terms with the jurisdictional principles that bar an injunction in this case.”

Stuckey, a former linebacker with New England and Tampa Bay, said he’s been in “constant contact” with the attorneys representing the current players.

“We thought the best way to remain in solidarity with all the players was to give everyone a voice at the table,” Stuckey said in a phone interview. “We wanted to make sure that we’re consistent with the goals of all NFL players. We want everyone to be on the same page. We hope that our efforts from this point forth remain consistent.”

WRITTEN BY ESPN & FULL STORY HERE